Practical question of your own legality of your own Rev

Practical question of your own legality of your own Rev

1857.

third.-The new 4th wedding from Legal “Crown and you will Point” A good.O.F. had been known of the a meal on Bro. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled new chair, therefore was stated that the brand new Judge upcoming contained 90 people.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and you can J. Bayly got elected the newest people in individuals Library Panel.

p. 207 Your body off an excellent whale, that was taken within Winterton, was being displayed for the Church Plain.

The fresh new Rev. W. D. Go, the minister regarding St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before leaving Southsea, been presented with a bag from ?61.

21st.-Brand new “Sisters” was for the crash with one of many brick piers off the newest Connection, it had much more broken.

Feb. next.-An enthusiastic Anti-Income tax fulfilling got stored on City Hall. The brand new Gran presided, plus the pursuing the participated in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake https://getbride.org/kuumia-ecuadorin-naisia/, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the newest mover in this matter.

Feb. 21st.-An effective “Poor’s Rates” meeting is stored during the Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may a resolution protesting contrary to the 1s. 6d. every quarter price is accompanied. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, R. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling talked on the subject, just like the carry out of one’s Guardians is defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among Board.

Feb. 25th.-An incident and therefore delighted considerable notice, ended up being read in the County Judge, Tolhouse-hall, before Legal (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The fresh plaintiff was Mr. John Cobb, leather-based vendor, to possess exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin looked; the newest defendants were Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may Grams. D. Palmer, who have been illustrated by Mr. J. L. Cufaude. Brand new plaintiff reported that he was an applicant towards the office regarding Councillor to your age like during the solicitation out of Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and Grams. D. Palmer. During the time he turned into an applicant the guy distinctly informed them which he would not pay out out-of his or her own pouch significantly more than ?ten towards costs of one’s election, also it try know that Liberal people, to which the guy belonged, do register others. The evening until the election he gotten an estimate away from what the costs was indeed more likely, along with result of he at a time saw one another Mr. Burroughs and you will Mr. Grams. D. Palmer. You to imagine, he thought, amounted so you can on ?forty-five, since the memberships altogether amounted so you can however, ?42. Just after particular dialogue they provided to hold your innocuous of your number of the expense that might go beyond the sum subscribed, and he and you can Mr. Burroughs up coming ran p. 208 towards the Committee-place of North-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs told you that they had produced agreements because of their pal John Cobb winning the market-ward. The expense of the election, that he (the fresh new plaintiff) missing, amounted entirely to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, hence, he now claimed on the defendants was ?16 1s. 7d.-The new plaintiff, inside the cross-examination by Mr. Cufaude, admitted you to definitely ?39 of the whole matter is actually getting – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated whenever, because plaintiff mentioned, new defendants got given him a guarantee with the excessive costs, the latest ensure must come into writing. And you will, while evidence try genuine, and therefore, yet not, the guy debated, it was impossible to the plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch as he themselves had welcome one to a corner regarding the full costs is actually getting – -, that has been an unlawful work.-Mr. Chamberlin contended the plaintiff, just after acquiring the brand new guarantee regarding the defendants, acted only upon new faith of that hope, hence ergo, while they had entered abreast of an involvement to blow the cash, these people were accountable. The bucks, more over, was not spent by plaintiff, however, by panel designated so you can conduct the latest election, and you may till the election are more than, the latest plaintiff was not aware the money had started invested into the – -.-Their Honor said it had been clear the latest be sure should have come written down. He was from thoughts, and, the plaintiff wasn’t bound to pay the illegal charge, and consequently he may maybe not offer their action for money that he said.-Brand new plaintiff try, accordingly, non-ideal.

A lire également

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *